Drivers and Motivators for Sustainability. Senior hospital leaders may be motivated to take on sustainability projects for any number of reasons: to improve image, build trust and reputation, and save money as well as in response to community pressures or risk management and regulatory considerations. Ahmet Akin and İlker Yilmaz, Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector, Procedia Economics and Finance, 38, (2), (2016)., Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 3, (168-181), (2012). Wiley Online Library. Download buku esps pkn kelas 6. This ready-to-use PowerPoint Corporate Social Responsibility template is designed to seamlessly fit into your CSR-related presentation. This 11-slide editable PowerPoint template covers the key external drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility for any organization; its 4 main components; corporate philanthropy implications; methods of implementing CSR and the 3 accepted models of CSR. Carroll's Four Part Model, Intersecting Circles (IC) Model and the Concentric Circles (CON) Model are presented in separate slides to explain different approaches to corporate social responsibility. Download this editable PowerPoint Template from http://www.24point0.com/ppt-shop/corporate-social-responsibility-template-powerpoint. Corporate Social Responsibility CSR PowerPoint Templates • 1. COMPANY LOGO Culture Environment People Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) • Table of Contents What is CSR? Key Drivers of CSR Main Components of CSR Implications of CSR Models of CSR Executing CSR • Who? • Carroll's Four-Part Pyramid Model • Intersecting Circles (IC) Model • Concentric Circle (CON) model • What is CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development • Key Drivers of CSR Government Policies Responsible Investment NGO Activism Litigation Foreign Investment Domestic & Foreign Consumers • The Four Components of CSR Economic Discretionary Ethical Legal • Implications of CSR WHO? The “Association Sphere” – partners in the global value chain The “Issue Sphere” – a broader range of issues to be influenced Government Authorities Core Firm JV Partners Core Firm • Models of Corporate Social Responsibility Carroll's Four-part Pyramid PHILANTHROPIC ETHICAL LEGAL ECONOMIC Responsibilities Be a good Corporate Citizen. Contribute resources to the community; improve quality of life Responsibilities Be ethical. Obligation to do what is right, just and fair; Avoid harm Responsibilities Obey the Law. Law is society’s codification of right and wrong; Play by the rules Responsibilities Be Profitable. The foundation upon which all others rest • Models of Corporate Social Responsibility Intersecting Circles (IC) Model PHILANTHROPIC Responsibilities Be a good Corporate Citizen. Contribute resources to the community; improve quality of life ETHICAL Responsibilities Be ethical. Obligation to do what is right, just and fair; Avoid harm LEGAL ECONOMIC Responsibilities Be Profitable. The foundation upon which all others rest Responsibilities Obey the Law. Decades of debate on corporate social responsibility (CSR) have resulted in a substantial body of literature offering a number of philosophies that despite real and relevant differences among their theoretical assumptions express consensus about the fundamental idea that business corporations have an obligation to work for social betterment. Robo family cast names list. All accounts of CSR recognize that business firms have many different kinds of responsibility, and seek to define both the scope of corporate responsibility in society and the criteria for measuring business performance in the social arena. Waddock used the metaphor of a branching tree to describe how the field has evolved into its current understanding of CSR, an understanding that attempts to link the relatively parallel universes of theory and practice, and to illustrate how various conceptual branches are related to each other. Fruitful as the development of a comprehensive organizing framework for the field has been, we are still left with the same quagmire of definitional problems that beclouded the old debate about the exact nature of CSR. The old claim that CSR “means something, but not always the same thing to everybody” is no less true today. This article seeks to add clarity to CSR theory and research by focusing on the core responsibilities that form the trunk of the branching CSR tree. A comparative analysis of three recognized CSR models—represented graphically as a pyramid, intersecting circles, and concentric circles—might help locate and clarify ambiguities through revealing systematic differences in their underlying assumptions, conceptual structure, methodological tools, and managerial implications. In the following section I briefly review the evolution of the CSR concept and its extensions. I next present the three CSR models beginning with a critical analysis of Carroll's CSR pyramid, a dominant model that has enjoyed wide popularity among business and society scholars; I will then examine the intersecting circles (IC) model, a CSR configuration representing overlapping responsibility areas; I will conclude with the concentric circle (CON) model, originally developed by the Committee for Economic Development (CED), and reformulated here so as to adjust to recent developments in CSR thought.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |